Optimizing the Refinery Operational Configuration: Case in Taxation at CO2 Emission

Chang-Chen Liu1, *, Jung-Hua Wu1, Ching Chen2
1 Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan;
2 Department of Adult and Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621, Taiwan

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 317
Abstract HTML Views: 431
PDF Downloads: 1
Total Views/Downloads: 749
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 202
Abstract HTML Views: 291
PDF Downloads: 1
Total Views/Downloads: 494

© 2013 Liu et al.;

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan. Tel: +886-56815637; Fax: +886-56812405; E-mail:


A refinery is essentially a joint production process system. Due to the complex nature of the process involved, while it converts heavier oils into high quality oil products, fuels and other high value products, it also provides a way to curb carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. As refineries are profit-seeking businesses, this paper used linear programming (LP) models to assess the impact of different taxation amounts on CO2 emissions on a refinery’s operational configuration, and energy using strategies for a refining expansion project in Taiwan, and to discover what the carbon price should be in order to justify the required changes. The result reveals the necessity of developing processes, such as the Delayed Coking (DCU) process combined with hydrotreating, to produce high-quality fuels and petrochemical products in the refinery. Our findings indicate that this anticipated expansion plan reduced CO2 emissions by 4.92%, while obtaining an efficiency of 14.46 USD/ton-CO2 at a cost of 30 USD/ton-CO2, and by 10.33% and 25.22% CO2 emission with efficiency gains of 15.22 and 78.61 USD/ton-CO2 at a cost of 90 and 180 USD/ton-CO2, respectively. When emission costs are over 90 USD/ton-CO2, the refinery opts for liquid petroleum gas (LPG) instead of burning fuel oil, since using hydrogen as a makeup fuel only proves beneficial when the CO2 emission costs are over 150 USD/ton-CO2.

Keywords: Crude oil, process, efficiency.